Volume 12, Number 24
11 April 2006





Click, to go back to the contents of this issue

This Week



We appreciate feedback from our readers
Browse through the collecton of older issues



"LIFE ETC."

I for Individual

I love contradictions. They have an interesting symmetrical geometry, like the one that appears between a photograph film and its negative. Like all symmetries, a contradiction triggers an urge to end its duality and give it unity.*

Let me talk about a contradiction, the way I often do: do you think that people like it when a successful person talks about his/her success? Yes? Are you sure? Now, I'll put the "modesty" thing aside and tell you that the bus stops at the entrance of the Main Campus were built about a month after I wrote a "Letter to the Editor" asking why we didn't have them.** Now, doesn't that sound narcissistic to you?

Most of us are raised with the idea that it's virtuous to do good things, but that we should never talk about them. Our parents have always told us to do good deeds secretly. This is because otherwise, they wouldn't be done for the sake of goodness, they would be done out of pride.

Now, take a look at what this doctrine has created: we all feel that if we let others know about something good we've done, they'll think that we're showing off. If you don't hide your kind actions, they'll say you're arrogant. If you accept praise for your abilities, they'll accuse you of being vain.

Everyone will tell you that they don't do good things simply in order to be praised. This is the biggest lie ever. We all really know that we would double our good deeds if TV programs would honor us for our kindness or courage.

As long as we hide good things, they become shameful. We never talk about the good things we do, as if they're sins. What kind of a mentality forces us to do such a thing? What kind of a person tries to create a universal law that expects everybody to hide the truth?

It's not a hard question: two possibilities come to mind. A person doesn't want others to talk about the things they do either because he/she's jealous, or because he/she needs to hide what he/she does. It wouldn't make sense to have good/courageous/clever people prohibiting other good/courageous/clever people from talking about their virtues.

Those who are virtuous enough to be modest in spite of their great abilities are the ones who are already virtuous. Their self-sacrifice lets others escape from the truth.*** As long as such individuals hide themselves and become part of the ordinary crowd in the name of virtue, we won't see many individual efforts to create small changes. This is because good, courageous and clever people need appreciation, just like everyone else. We need to let people know that if they do or create something positive, they will be appreciated.

As long as the need for change grows greater every day, and we continue to hinder vital individual sources of small changes, people will continue to prefer large-scale, violent actions to these small individual reforms. If you teach people that the individual is worthless without society, you cannot expect people to change themselves before they try to change others.

* An idea previously stated by Jean Baudrillard
** Bilkent News, 7 Feb. 2006,
*** Basically the gist of the "Atlas Shrugged" trilogy by Ayn Rand


 

İsmail O. Postalcıoğlu (POLS/III)
ismail_orhan@yahoo.com

 Click, to go back to the contents of this issue








Bilkent News Welcomes Feedback From Readers.
This newsletter will print letters received from readers.
Please submit your letters to bilnews@bilkent.edu.tr
or to the Communications Unit, Engineering Building, room EG-23, ext. 1487.
The Editorial Board will review the letters and print according to available space.